The short answer: an interview scorecard lists the competencies the job needs, the questions that test each one, a shared rating scale, and space for evidence and a recommendation. A rubric adds examples of what a weak, solid and strong answer looks like for each question, so every interviewer scores the same way. Used together, they turn an interview into a structured interview, which research shows is one of the best predictors of job performance. Download the free interview scorecard (PDF): two pages, with a 1–5 scale, an evidence column, a notes page and an example rubric. Below is how to fill it in and use it.
Why use a scorecard
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) defines a structured interview as one that measures “job-related competencies” by asking about past behavior or hypothetical situations, where “all candidates are asked the same predetermined questions in the same order” and “all responses are evaluated using the same rating scale.”
It’s worth the effort. A 2022 re-analysis of decades of hiring research by Sackett and colleagues, published in the Journal of Applied Psychology, found that structured interviews had the highest average validity (.42) of the selection methods studied, above cognitive ability tests (.31).
A scorecard also:
- Makes decisions fairer, because every candidate is judged on the same criteria.
- Makes debriefs faster, because interviewers bring evidence, not impressions.
- Documents your decision in case it’s questioned later.
What goes on an interview scorecard
- Candidate, role, date, interviewer and interview stage.
- Four to six competencies the job needs, taken from the job description: for example, problem solving, collaboration, communication, customer focus, or a technical skill.
- The question for each competency, written before the interview.
- A rating scale, the same for every interviewer.
- Evidence notes: what the candidate said and did.
- An overall recommendation, with the strongest evidence and the main concerns.
The rating scale
Our template uses a five-point scale with a short description at each level:
| Score | Label | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not shown | No relevant example, or the example contradicts the competency |
| 2 | Limited | A vague or partial example; key actions or results missing |
| 3 | Meets | A clear, relevant example with their own actions and a result |
| 4 | Strong | Specific, well-judged actions and a measurable result |
| 5 | Exceptional | Strong evidence across examples, at or above the level of the role |
OPM notes that giving all competencies equal weight is “generally the most effective and defensible course of action” unless you have a clear, documented reason to weight them differently.
How to write a rubric (behavioral anchors)
A rubric describes what an answer looks like at different levels for a specific question. Write anchors for at least 1, 3 and 5. For example:
Competency: Collaboration. Question: “Tell me about a time you worked with others to reach a shared goal.”
- 1: Describes working alone, or blames others for problems; no clear shared goal.
- 3: Clear shared goal; explains their own role, how they kept others informed, and the result.
- 5: Brings people with different views together, resolves a disagreement constructively, and credits others while showing a measurable result.
Write anchors with the people who know the job best, and test them on a few practice answers before using them. OPM’s guidance notes that custom rating scales take “extensive subject matter expert involvement.”
Taking interview notes
- Write down what the candidate says and did, in their words where you can: “Cut onboarding from six weeks to three,” not “impressive.”
- Note the situation, their actions and the result for each example. That’s the STAR method, from the interviewer’s side.
- Ask one follow-up when an answer is vague: “What did you do, specifically?” or “What was the result?”
- Note when a competency wasn’t assessed rather than guessing a score.
- Avoid notes about personal characteristics unrelated to the job.
The second page of the template is a notes page with the example rubric and rules for the debrief.
Running a fair debrief
- Score independently right after the interview, before talking to anyone.
- Share scores and evidence competency by competency, not an overall “I liked them.”
- Discuss big differences in scores; they usually mean interviewers heard different evidence or interpreted the scale differently.
- Watch for common biases: similarity to yourself, first impressions, and one strong answer coloring the rest (the halo effect).
- Decide against the criteria you set, and record why.
Common mistakes
- Adding competencies after the interview to justify a gut feeling.
- Different questions for different candidates for the same role.
- Scores with no evidence in the notes.
- Too many competencies. Four to six per interview is plenty.
- Using the scorecard only for rejected candidates. Use it for everyone.
Running structured interviews at volume? Our guide to the best AI recruiting software compares tools that score answers against your criteria for a recruiter to review.
For candidates: what this means for you
Structured interviews reward answers with specific evidence: the situation, what you did and a measurable result. If you’re preparing for one, practice answering behavioral questions out loud with the STAR method. See our guides to common interview questions and running a mock interview, which has a free scorecard for practice.
Frequently asked questions
What is an interview scorecard?
What's the difference between an interview scorecard and a rubric?
What rating scale should I use in interviews?
Are structured interviews better than unstructured ones?
What should interview notes include?
Sources
- U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Structured Interviews and How do I score a structured interview?. Read on 30 September 2026.
- OPM, How do I develop a customized rating scale for structured interviews?. Read on 30 September 2026.
- Sackett, P. R., Zhang, C., Berry, C. M., & Lievens, F. (2022). Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 2040–2068. Summarized by SIOP in Is Cognitive Ability the Best Predictor of Job Performance?. Read on 30 September 2026.